The documentary film Two
Million Minutes, Chapter 1: A Global Examination is a film whose premise I
cannot, with any honesty, support or agree with in any way, shape, or
form. Its bias is blatantly self-evident
and the logic it employs is a classic case of flawed deductive logic and can
only be accepted by those employing a confirmation bias fallacy. It purports to present a realistic picture of
Indian, Chinese, and American schooling, but cherry-picks the students it
utilizes to represent the three nations in question, leading viewers to erroneously
conclude that American schools and American students are disastrously behind in
global educational standards.
The reality
is that, although rapidly and catastrophically shrinking over the past fifty or
sixty years, emphasis on the humanities and associated skills of critical
thinking, problem solving, analysis, synthesis, dialectic, and liberal,
creative thought and experimentation is a standard foundational pillar of
American (and indeed Western) education that is largely absent from non-Western
schooling. The tragedy of American
schools and, indeed, the greatest failure of American schools, is the shrinking
support for and inept instruction of the humanities coupled with our insistence
on being more like Asian educational institutions. Indeed, I would strongly argue that it is
because of the perception that Asian schooling is superior to that of the West
that we are abandoning the humanities that have generated the liberal political
models, freedoms, philosophies, and reasoned, rational critique that have been
hallmarks of Western thought since the Athenian agora. Indeed, Albert Einstein, who had difficulty
with mathematics but could visualize the immense complexities of space-time,
would never have succeeded in these Asian school systems.
My own
experience with Asian schooling and my numerous colleagues in the ESL field
abroad who have worked in China
can attest to the dismal lifestyles and stunted intellectual, emotional, and
analytical development of Asian students.
In those countries, equality of education is not guaranteed nor is it
even remotely encouraged. In the United States,
educational equality may not be a reality for some geographic and demographic
sectors of society, but it is still the ideal for which we strive. In countries like Korea,
China, and Japan, students
brutally compete for percentile ranks in their schools, since higher test
scores can secure seats in better middle schools and high schools, which in
turn can help students get into more prestigious universities. Once in university, a student no longer needs
to study as hard and most of their activity at that level is geared toward
creating connections and building a network that will help them in a workplace
environment that is most assuredly not
a meritocracy. The West still has the
lion’s share of the best and most rigorous universities in the world.
The actual
lives of the students are completely consumed with school work. In Korea I have seen some students
study themselves into illness and others become dependent on drugs to the point
of severe abuse in order to stay awake and study. About half of students at my Korean middle
school had resigned themselves to menial-labor jobs because they had fallen too
far behind the most advanced students in their grades. They felt they could never catch up fast
enough to make a difference and so studied only enough to scrape by without
getting into trouble. After school, the
students would attend cram schools into the night. Few got any decent amount of sleep. None of them ever had the opportunity to have
a real childhood and develop the imaginative, creative lifestyles that American
students could enjoy during their off-hours.
Students rarely had time to play in organized sports, develop hobbies,
or engage in activities that fostered self-esteem or gave the students a sense
that life was worth living. I would
strongly suggest the viewer watch this documentary (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5GvkcjszLk)
which is in the works. Although South Korea is not part of the documentary, many
of the characteristics of Korean education are identical to Chinese education
(as well as Japanese education) from the evidence I have gathered from the
other expat English teachers I had met during my sojourn in Korea.
The problem
with the American students is not
that we are falling behind in math and science.
That we are falling behind in those fields is a product of a sickness
that has developed in American culture since the end of the Second World War. The prosperity of the 1950s decade created a
generation that was used to getting what it wanted—the Baby Boomers who
referred to themselves as the “Me Generation.”
The birth of the adolescent in society and culture heralded a shift in
what constituted as adulthood in the United States. Ever since, the ability of Americans to
become adjusted adults has become more and more tenuous. For one who is curious as to the
socio-historical roots of this phenomenon, I would advice the reader to watch
the BBC documentary Century of the Self
by Adam Curtis (it can be found on youtube for free).
The illness
in our educational system is cultural
and not entirely academic. Yes, poor
teachers, low funding, oversized classes, and other elements come into play in
American schools (just watch Waiting for
“Superman” and ask yourself why all those kids want lottery tickets to go
to charter schools). However, the real
culprit is culture. American culture is decadent. Our television, movies, and video games
celebrate stupidity and mindlessness.
People who are intellectual are shunned in American schools and the butt
of jokes in American television (just watch Big
Bang Theory on TBS and you’ll see what I mean).
If this
documentary had approached me when I was in high school (1994-1997), they would
have traced a student who graduated 9th in his class, scored a 1300
on the SAT without studying, took honors and AP classes, did concert band and
concert choir, read John Locke and Plato in his own free time, memorized and
recited Shakespeare for fun, studied chess competitively, participated in the
school musical, played drums in a rock band, did community service with the
National Honors Society, took karate classes twice a week, had a part-time job
delivering pizzas, and still managed to paint models and play miniature
wargames on odd weekends. However, this
documentary chose to focus on two mediocre American high school students that I
(when I was 16) would have thought were complete idiots (yes, even the boy who
got a full ride to Purdue). My parents
pushed me relentlessly. If I got an A,
my father would ask me, “Why isn’t it an A+?”
My parents
also taught me how to change brakes, oil, fluids, lights, filters, spark plugs,
shocks, and various engine components on a car, do laundry, repair home appliances,
cook, fix household plumbing, balance a checkbook, use MS DOS, and maintain and
care for a home and lawn—lessons absolutely unheard of in East Asia. Students over there are far, far too busy
studying to actually acquire any practical, real-world experience in
maintenance, repair, or even an appreciation for the value of money. None of them have time for part-time work
because of their devotion to study—study which, for far too many of them, given
the competitive nature of their schooling, results in many students going to
mediocre universities despite how much effort they put into their studies.
What these
students have in East Asia that American
students do not is an appreciation for
education. And that, again, is
cultural. Americans view education as
simply a means to an end. High school is
boring and a drag. University classes
are, too, but at least they are job training and you get a pretty piece of
paper that says you can get a job making $90,000 a year. Americans disdain intelligence and
intellectualism, celebrate self-interest and ostentatious consumerism, and are
loath to take responsibility for their own actions. Many professors in the liberal arts to whom I
have spoken feel that these cultural traits of Americans today are products of
our dwindling emphasis on the humanities in school, university, and society as
a whole—disciplines that encourage introspection, self-criticism and analysis,
free and creative thought, and inculcate a desire to be free tempered with a
sense of civic duty and appreciation for order.
A philosophy professor here at Eastern once commented to me on an
article he read in Rolling Stone
about the Dartmouth
fraternity scene, saying, “These guys were beasts. They were going to end up at Goldman
Sachs. They were completely
self-interested, barely liberal, beasts.
And the university didn’t much care.
They were going to be good donors.”
A better
comparison would be with German and perhaps Dutch education systems. The Germans also track students and based on
performance assign them to different high schools which, in turn, determine if
the students go on to university or vocational/technical training
academies. However, they also emphasize
the humanities and many of their modern cultural heroes are philosophers and
intellectuals such as Jurgen Habermas and Michel Foucault. American cultural heroes are brash, arrogant
athletes that couldn’t reason their way out of a wet paper bag.
However,
the film completely ignores the European educational scene entirely, playing
off of our fear of the “Yellow Peril,” as if Sax Rohmer’s worst nightmares for
the Western world could be summed up by Chinese high school education. The makers of Two Million Minutes started off with an assumption—that Asian
schools are beating us—an assumption that they fail to prove yet attempt to
work backwards, cherry-picking the students they wish to examine and track as
if that sort of post hoc ergo propter hoc
reasoning will suffice.
It does not
suffice. Indeed, the premise is entirely
wrong. The Indians and Chinese are not
beating us because of our education system.
They are beating us because of culture.
Their citizens value education and learning. Ours once valued frugality, industriousness,
creativity, risk-taking, and hard work.
Americans have come to value stupidity and self-interest. That is why we have fallen behind. It is not because we do not push science and
math in our schools but because in our decadence we have abandoned those
principles which made us unique and strong in the first place.
4 comments:
Since Google decided to eat my previous comment..
I think the problem isn't that they do not push science and math at all. I think the problem is they pretty much have begun to push it to the exclusion of everything else. I can understand them having special grants or scholarships for STEM programs, but the fact they have NOTHING even remotely similar for humanities is a bit frustrating.
To put it into perspective, due to having been out of school so long, I tested into a remedial math program, I have to take it or they won't let me take my college classes. I'm getting all A's and A+'s on my college classes.. but yet every time I slip a few points in my math class, I get a nasty email from the school threatening me with getting kicked out of school.. It becomes very disheartening.. especially when all my humanities classes are so slipshod in their quality.
Lagomorph, considering your comments on One Last Sketch, I have to ask, where are you going and what is your major? Perhaps you'd be better served transferring someplace else?
At the moment I'm attending a 2 year commuter college which has a graduation rate hovering around 9%. At first I was confused about that and chalked it up to people transferring to 4 year institutions. Now though, I realize it's simply because the school itself is craptastic.
Effectively I signed up at that school, following the advice of the Admissions Councillor from a 4 year school who said doing my Core classes there would be easier. I didn't count on having to do all the remedial math though, and that is holding me up.
I plan to transfer to UGA or Georgia Southern as soon as I can though.
Post a Comment